Unit 02

What people are pursuing

Several research agendas have crystallised around AI verification: frontier auditing, hardware-enabled mechanisms, cloud governance, international agreement design, and broad technical-governance taxonomies. This unit gives you the map before the mechanisms.

By the end of the unit, you should be able to place a new verification paper inside the agenda it contributes to and understand what problem family it is trying to solve.

READ 2.1

Open Problems in Technical AI Governance

Reuel, Hardy, Smith et al. (2025)

The broad technical-governance catalogue. Focus on compute, verification, and auditing sections to see how the verification problem sits among adjacent open problems.

→ arXiv:2407.14981
READ 2.2

Hardware-Enabled Mechanisms for Verifying Responsible AI Development

O'Gara, Kulp, Hodgkins, Petrie et al. (2025)

The hardware-rooted taxonomy: location verification, network verification, offline licensing, and workload verification. This is the core framing for hardware-enabled AI governance.

→ arXiv:2505.03742
READ 2.3

Frontier AI Auditing

Brundage et al. (2026)

A detailed agenda for rigorous third-party assessment of frontier AI labs. Read the verification-relevant sections as the auditing counterpart to the hardware agenda.

→ arXiv:2601.11699
READ 2.4

Mechanisms to Verify International Agreements About AI Development

Scher & Thiergart (2025)

A survey of mechanisms for verifying international agreements about AI development. Useful for understanding the trust problem between mutually suspicious parties.

→ arXiv:2506.15867
READ 2.5

Verification for International AI Governance

Harack et al. (Oxford Martin AIGI, 2025)

The Oxford Martin framing of international AI verification. Read alongside RAND and FLI-style proposals to compare institutional assumptions.

Available via Oxford Martin AI Governance Initiative.
READ 2.6

Verifying International Agreements on AI

Baker et al. (RAND, 2025)

The RAND treatment of verification for international AI agreements. Useful for comparing policy design constraints with the more technical agendas.

Available via rand.org.
READ 2.7

Hardware-Level Governance of AI Compute

Ansari (2026)

A recent feasibility taxonomy connecting hardware capabilities to regulatory compliance and treaty verification. Read for a synthesis of what hardware can plausibly support.

→ arXiv:2604.04712